Press and Politics essays

Press and Politics expositions Perspectives of various press to the withdrawal of the counter disruption bill In this venture, we are going to investigate various mentalities of various papers in HK to the debate issue C withdrawal of the counter disruption charge, which started gigantic road dissents and set off the domain's most noticeably awful political emergency since 1997. To make it more clear, it is a deferment of the enactment system of the national security bill just, however not a wiping out of the Article 23. In the first place, we can investigate the publication of MingPao (see reference article no.1) on 2003-09-06. As a matter of fact, we can see the general disposition of papers in Hong Kong hold perspectives pretty much comparative.  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã£Å¾Ã£'æ'ã™â ³Ã£â€°  Ã¢ ¡Ã£ ¹Ã¢ ¾Ã¢ ¡23-l⠡⠭â ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ We bolster the enactment of the Article 23 in the Basic Law  ¡Ã¢ ­Ã¢ ¡ MingPao bolster the enactment, however more meeting and thought is required before the execution.  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã¢ ³Ã£ËœÃ¢â‚¬ ¡Ã£ ¸Ã¢ °Ã¢ ²Ã¢ ²Ã£ Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¸Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­Ã£Å¡Ã£â€¡Ã£Æ'㠷ãâ€"Ç⠵ã„㠻㠏ã‡â °Ã¢ ¸Ã£â€ºÃ£Ë†Ã£â€¹Ã¢ µÃ£â€žÃ£'iÃ¥ ⠡â ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ the withdrawal of the national security charge  ¡Ã¢ ­ is insightful, it meets the desire of Hong Kong Peopleâ ¡ In this way, the deferment of the bill is invited, and they by and large figure it can do products to the economy.  ¡Ã‚ °Ã‚ ¡Ã‚ ­ÃƒÅ½Ãƒ'Æ'ÕJÃ… ¾ÃƒÅ'Ø...^Õà ¾Ã‚ ¸ÃƒË†Ã‚ ²Ãƒâ€°iÇà ÃƒÅ Ã‚ ¡23-lãÿ^⠳ãÅ"ã‹ã ¹Ã¢ ¸Ã¢ µÃ£â€žeã•'⠏ã˜â µÃ£â€" ¸Ã£â€žÃ£â€"Æ'ã†ã† Çãã'⠼⠳â ¡ Äã'ãÆ'⠵ã„ãâ€"à ·iLi Ãƒâ€¹Ãƒâ€ Ã‚ µÃƒâ€žÃƒâ€¢Ãƒ ¾Ãƒâ€"ÃŽÅ ¾Ãƒâ€žyßà ¾^m ³F ¡  ¡Ã¢ °Ã¢ ¡Ã¢ ­ if the administration doesn't change its working style of  ¡listening to the supporters voice only⠡â ¯,  ¡making everybody either frie... <!